suhaildavidranjha

Pakistan, with its historical verifiable and social tradition of strict diversity, is faced with enormous challenges in promoting interfaith harmony. Although there are promises by God to ensure interfaith harmony, strict minorities are constantly exposed to simple segregation and savagery. This article critically discusses processes that can improve interfaith resilience based on practical estimates like educational reform, exchange, legal reform, and social action, including contextual analysis and clear evidence.

Based on 2017's registration figures, the population of around 96.28% are of Islam, 2.14% of Hinduism, 1.27% of Christianity, and 0.41% comprises all forms of religions other than the above-stated three. Minorities remain isolated socially and discriminated against despite sacrilege laws and constitutional provisions (Articles 20-22). Regulations and their demands are essential; yet regulations that are nefarious or are misused against various religions must be avoided. This article dissects means of promoting interfaith harmony, taking into account successful initiatives and astute mechanisms.

From its inception, Pakistan's public character crisis has devalued minorities socially. Obscenity charges have often been used as political means and have resulted in 1,865 cases against minorities from 1987 to 2018 (Public Commission for Equity and Harmony). Sectarian violence such as the 2013 bomb blast on a Christian locality in Lahore reveals the imperative for reforms at once.

Current Measures and Mechanisms to Promote Interfaith Harmony

• Public Commission for Minorities (NCM): Blasted for shortcomings; continues to be a key support forum.
• Board of Islamic Belief System (CII): Formulates dialogue but gets criticized for moderate policymaking.
• Harmony and Improvement Foundation: Organizes behavior interfaith studios in small towns.
• URI Pakistan: Engages with interfaith harmony issues, including 44 individual strict events.
• James Channan and the Catholic Church: Focus on peacebuilding and interfaith dialogue.
• Educational program Harmonization: The 2020 Single Public Educational Plan (SNC) claims to be inclusive but is Islam-oriented. Recommendations are to incorporate similar religion modules and emphasizing minorities' contributions to Pakistani history.
• Educator Training: Bodies like the Indus Asset Center (IRC) train teachers to overcome fixed inclination. For instance, studies in Quetta have decreased partisan tensions in schools.

Coordinating Viable Interfaith Dialogue

• Scholastic Platforms: Yearly gatherings at the Worldwide Islamic College include researchers from different religions.
• Youth Programs: Tranquility School in Lahore pairs Madrasa and Christian school students on joint projects.
• Neighborhood discourse: Karachi’s interfaith chamber for harmony strengthens the interfaith bond of compromise and social festivities.
• Engage in analytically unique problems: Fusing heads of various religions on issues of shared concern to perceive each other's standpoints and underline typical qualities.
• The role of the media: Interfaith dialogues are promoted by television projects and web-based entertainment campaigns to instill resilience and respect in the public. 
• Train for Mullahs: The IRI has taught the imams Quranic verses such as 5:32 to peaceful living.
• Faith-Based Fatwa: The Jamia-Ashrafiya in 2018 issued a fatwa condemning violence against non-Muslims. Organized interfaith engagement is a compelling means of encouraging concurrence and concord in the public arena, raising awareness and astuteness among religions.
• Local Interfaith Councils: Karachi's Interfaith Committee for Harmony coordinates compromise and social celebrations.
• Social Services: After the 2014 Peshawar church attack, Muslims and Christians jointly rebuilt the All Holy People Church, setting an example of strength.
• Correcting Irreverence Laws: General liberties organizations demand buffers to avoid abuse of such laws.
• Insurance of Love Places: A 2014 High Court decision (Suo Motu Case No. 1) guides security of minority sites; however, it is slow in implementation.
• Television Programming: The 2019 TV show "Khuda Zameen Se Gaya Nahi Hai" depicted minorities at a human level.
• Web-based Entertainment Campaigns: NGO "Bolo bhi's" "Spread Love, Not Disdain" campaign minimizes fanaticism.
• Reaction to the Peshawar Church Attack (2014): Muslims put human security around places of worship, expressing solidarity.
• Christian Study Community (CSC) Rawalpindi: Fostering Hindu-Muslim-Christian discussion through workshops and libraries.
• Extremism: Some extremist groups incite sectarian conflicts.
• Economics: Poor minority communities are made poorer, including the Hindu Dalits of Sindh.
• Political Manipulation: Political parties neglect minority rights for political gain. As I think Orientation Strategies, Measures, and some Recommendations for it.
• National Commission for Justice and Peace (2018): Provided facts regarding legislation concerning blasphemy.
• Supreme Court of Pakistan (2014): Issued promises on minority rights.
• Ahmad Khalid (2020): Islamic education interfaith dialogue was addressed in the Journal of Peace Studies.

This broad framework, with local models and suggestions on strategy, offers necessary values for fostering interfaith friendliness in Pakistan.

How One Treats Others and Their Faith is An Important Human Virtue?

1. Understanding and respecting other people's emotions increases normal resilience.
2. Accepting other people's beliefs rather than condemning them is a prerequisite for social peace.
3. Acceptance of religious and cultural diversity is a national integration force.
4. Love, respect, and tolerance are the true paths to peace and coexistence.

An interactive mix of education, dialogue, legal accountability, and media engagement is required. Strong political will and global engagement (e.g., UNDP endorsement) can complement local action. Pakistan's future is contingent on comprehending its multicultural potential.

The state and social institutions in Pakistan are collectively working towards interfaith harmony. By adding norms of love, resilience, and respect to educational curricula, the mentality of the younger generation can be changed. Leaders of firms have a significant role in promoting dialogue. Appropriate measures are being taken to safeguard minority rights. In case of failure of dialogue, intervention and a legal recourse are utilized to address problems.

By Suhail David Ranjha

Website: https://suhaildavidranjha.com/

FB: https://www.facebook.com/people/Suhail-David-Ranjha/61572927879798/

Nepotism and corruption have had extensive and endemic effects on every branch of Pakistan's economy, politics, and society for decades. Not only do these ills impede national development but also severely erode public faith in state institutions. This paper tries to critically assess the root causes of nepotism and corruption in Pakistan, estimate their socio-economic and institutional costs, and determine viable methods for their eradication, with a view towards long-term national development and good governance.

The economic cost of nepotism and corruption is widespread. Such actions hinder the proper use and deployment of financial resources. At government agencies, successful projects are allocated on grounds of connections and not ability, depriving the country of genuine expertise and ingenuity. Corruption amounts to billions of rupees of economic loss annually, according to the Pakistan Economic Survey. This corruption reduces economic growth significantly and deters investor confidence.

The poem by Nawab Ahsan encapsulates this sentiment:

"Falsehood, violation of trust, enmity, and corruption have been for sale in minds, And in the scales weigh gold not belief, ask not its price."

Nepotism and corruption significantly erode the rule of law in Pakistan. They are the reasons for systematic injustice and enhance the time lag in the judicial process. Often, legal decisions are made on the basis of personal choice rather than legal merit, negating public confidence in the judiciary. For this reason, the legal framework becomes ineffective and public trust in justice wanes.

These malpractices also widen social inequality. The poor classes suffer disproportionately, while the rich manipulate the system to their benefit. This worsens general discontent in societies and leads to unrest, weakening national cohesion.

A number of examples exist of countries having successfully curbed nepotism and corruption through implementing robust reforms and institution-building.

In Singapore, which in the 1960s was bogged down in corruption and cronyism, the government introduced far-reaching reforms. Tough ethical norms for civil servants were introduced, coupled with robust oversight arrangements. Anti-corruption agencies were equipped with teeth, and public services were computerized, significantly curtailing the scope for bribery and enhancing administrative transparency.

South Korea had made comprehensive reforms especially in its judiciary and education fields, encouraging moral consciousness and strengthening accountability measures. Legal openness was prioritized in governance as well as in corporate transactions, helping South Korea project itself in the world globally despite domestic issues.

Italy, in response to the Mani Pulite (Clean Hands) scandal of the 1990s, enhanced the autonomy of its accountability institutions and established measures to enhance transparency in public services. Fiscal reforms were brought about to combat corruption and put the country on the way towards sustainable governance.

Drawn from these international experiences, the following reforms are critical for Pakistan to eliminate nepotism and corruption:

Legal Reforms

Pakistan's existing law against corruption tends to lag behind in implementation. It is essential to strengthen anti-corruption law and the rigorous enforcement of its provisions. Institutions of accountability need to be granted autonomy, adequate resources, and immunity from political interference.

Digitalization of public services has the potential to heavily constrain human discretion and thereby reduce bribe opportunities. Increased openness in bureaucratic processes will enhance service delivery and reduce avenues of corrupt practices, as demonstrated by Singapore and Italy's experiences.

Ethical and Civic Education

Moral and ethical education as a part of secondary school curriculum has the capacity to nurture integrity culture among youths. Corruption and nepotism awareness programs should be started in schools and extended to the government offices to establish a social consensus against corruption and nepotism.

Strengthening Civil Society and Media

The existence of a vibrant civil society and an accountable, free media is vital in the fight against corruption. Media advocacy and civic action increase pressures on institutions to act responsibly and transparently. Civil society organizations should also engage in monitoring public sector performance.

Institutionalizing Accountability

Anti-corruption agencies ought to be fully autonomous and functionally independent. They must not be exposed to political interference and their performance should be monitored periodically to ensure transparency and effectiveness. 

The imposition of these sweeping reforms is essential to address the root causes of nepotism and corruption in Pakistan. Their proper implementation will not only grow economic stability but also open doors toward justice, equality, and national advancement. International experiences can be learned from, and Pakistan can anticipate becoming an open and progressive state. But only by following the guidance of honest and committed leadership is this transformation possible.

By Suhail David Ranjha

Website: https://suhaildavidranjha.com/

Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/people/Suhail-David-Ranjha/61572927879798/